Legal Opinion · Dissent

Madden v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2015No. 2013-CT-00159-SCTPublished

1Dissent

KING, Justice,

Objects with Separate Written Statement:

¶ 1. Because I believe that Madden is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to determine whether his fundamental right to due process was violated, I respectfully object to the order entered herein.

*471¶ 2. Willie Madden was convicted for the transfer of a controlled substance and sentenced as a habitual offender to serve fifteen years, day-for-day. Madden contends he was illegally sentenced as a habitual offender, and that his trial counsel was ineffective.

¶ 3. In March 2002, Madden was indicted for the transfer of a controlled substance in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Rowland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Brooks v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Herman GoldfadenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Rowland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API