Legal Opinion

State v. Giaudrone

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1920No. 15535PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Davidson, J., entered June 6, 1919, upon a trial and conviction of violating the prohibition law.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The defendant, Giaudrone, was convicted by a jury of a violation of the act relating to the manufacture, keeping, sale and disposition of intoxicating liquors, and appeals from the judgment pronounced against him.

The facts of the case are not in dispute. The defendant, in the fall of the year 1914, manufactured a quantity of grape wine, some forty gallons of which he had in his possession on December 27, 1918. The wine was kept at his private home, for the use of him*398self and Ms family as a beverage, without intent or purpose to sell or dispose of it in barter or traffic. The wine was an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. KarsunkyWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  2. State v. KelloggIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In RE WALDER v. BelnapWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Walder v. BelnapWashington Supreme Court · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API