Legal Opinion

Doll v. Johnston

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 2, 1938No. 8758PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Application for a writ of habeas corpus by Edward Doll against James A. Johnston, Warden United States Penitentiary, Alcatraz, California. From the order denying the application appellant appeals.

The facts upon which appellant based his petition for a writ of habeas corpus are as follows:

An indictment containing four counts was returned in the District Court of the United States, for the Southern District of Illinois, on April 30, 1930, charging the said Doll with violations df the National Motor Vehicle Theft Act, 18 U.S. C.A. § 408. The first count of the indictment charged appellant with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chrysler v. ZerbstCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  2. York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sam Pearce and Harold HadesmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  2. Billy G. Woody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  3. United States v. DyeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1945
  4. Batson v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  5. United States v. SpradleyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API