Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Sutherland

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1934No. 4-3337PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, C. J.

The parties to this unfortunate divorce suit were intermarried at Cleveland, Ohio, in 1913', and there resided as husband and wife until 1929. For the sole and only purpose of ridding himself of his marriage vows, so solemnly assumed in 1913, appellee came to this State in May, 1932, and established himself in a Little Rock hotel and thereafter on November 7, 1932, filed this suit in the Pulaski Chancery Court alleging as grounds for divorce:

First, willful desertion, beginning in 1929; secondly, indignities, which rendered his condition in life intolerable.

Appellant filed an answer denying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kientz v. KientzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Rie v. RieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  3. Arnold v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  5. Darrow v. DarrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Copeland v. CopelandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Gabler v. GablerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  3. Settles v. SettlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Alston v. AlstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API