Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Wheeler

California Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1992No. S021961Published

1DissentArabian, J.

I dissent. Contrary to the majority, I would hold that a witness may not be impeached by evidence of specific acts of misconduct other than a prior felony conviction. Under today’s holding, a Pyrrhic victory for the prosecution, trial courts will inevitably become mired in extraneous, time-consuming matters, and potential witnesses throughout the state will suffer inestimable injury with little, if any, resulting benefit to the truth-finding process. The holding is lamentable for it is not mandated by the text of Proposition 8, as an analysis of the interplay between California Constitution,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Progress Glass Co. v. American InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API