De Sobry v. de Laistre
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Error to the General Court. The defendant in error, -Lewis Lugustine Terrier de Laisire, brought an action of assumpsit against Benjamin de,Éóbr¡/, executor of Michael Terrier de Laistre, (now plaintiff in error.) The declara» . ..s * '■ tion contained four counts: The first for ¿£4518 17 7 cur- ,. .. , . . , J . . ■ .rent money, for sundry matters, properly chargeaole in tin account.
Read the full summary
Error to the General Court. The defendant in error, -Lewis Lugustine Terrier de Laisire, brought an action of assumpsit against Benjamin de,Éóbr¡/, executor of Michael Terrier de Laistre, (now plaintiff in error.) The declara» . ..s * '■ tion contained four counts: The first for ¿£4518 17 7 cur- ,. .. , . . , J . . ■ .rent money, for sundry matters, properly chargeaole in tin account. The second for money had and received; The third for money laid out) expended and paid; and the ■fourth for money lent add delivered'. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit and fene adminisl'ravit; to which the…
1Opinion of the Court
. The Court
concurred in the opinions oí the General Court, in the first, fourth, and fifth bills of exceptions* taken bj the 'defendant in that court.
JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.
2Cited by18 opinions
- Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. G.C. Zarnas & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Baltimore & Ohio Rail Road v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Crago v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- Hite v. KeeneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.