Legal Opinion

Mccausland v. PepsiCo, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 14, 2024No. 5:23-cv-04526Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IAN MCCAUSLAND, et al., Case No. 23-cv-04526-PCP 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 9 v. DISMISS IN PART 10 PEPSICO, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendant. 11 12 13 In this lawsuit, plaintiffs Ian McCausland, Carlo Garcia, and Michael Zurl allege that 14 PepsiCo, Inc. deceptively advertises that its Gatorade Protein Bars promote consumers’ fitness, 15 health, athleticism, and well-being when they in fact contain high levels of total and added sugars 16 that render such claims misleading. Plaintiffs further contend that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Marder v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API