Legal Opinion
In re the Construction of Last Will & Testament of Tallman
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided April 20, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, S.
The holographic will of the decedent was admitted to probate by this court on December 29, 1927. The *864construction of the will was in issue upon the probate proceeding, but the order admitting the will to probate reserved the question so raised for future consideration and decree. The will is dated November 4, 1920, and is as follows:
“ First. After all my lawful debts are paid and discharged, I give, devise and bequeath all my Real Estate and live Stock Remaining on the farm at time of my Death to my Son Samuel. I aliso give to my Son Samuel D. Tallman $2,000) two thousand…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Crawford v. . McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Banzer v. . BanzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Burnham v. . ComfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- In re the Last Will & Testament of BarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- In Re the Will of BarneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re the Estate of SmallmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
- In re the Estate of LordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1929
- Trustees of Baker University v. Trustees of the Endowment Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- In re the Estate of BillingsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re the Probate of the Will of JeromosNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.