Legal Opinion

Kincaid v. Dormey

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Livingston Circuit Court. cited: Tamm vs. Kellogg, 19 Mo., 118 ; 5 Met., 179 ; 11 Cush., 210 ; Kincaid vs. Donney, 17 Mo., 337.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

This case has once before been in this court, (47 Mo., 337.) when it was reversed and remanded for' a new trial, in consequence of what was conceived to be a wrong interpretation, placed upon an alleged agreement by the tribunal below trying the cause. The cause was re-tried in substantial compliance with the law as laid down by this Court, and the plaintiff again had a verdict and judgment. There can be no estoppel in a case of this hind, if the parties acted under a mutual mistake of facts. The evidence in reference to the agreement, as to the location of the divisional fence was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BabbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  2. Clemens v. BroomfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  3. Kincaid v. DormeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. Knowlton v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. West v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API