Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Lamont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 3, 2014Published

1Dissent

Fahey, J.P., and Feradotto, J. (dissenting).

We respectfully dissent because, in our view, the evidence is legally insufficient to support defendant’s conviction of attempted robbery in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt (Fenal Law §§ 100.00, *1073160.10 [1], [2] [b]). We would therefore reverse the judgment and dismiss the indictment.

It is “an essential of the due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment that no person shall be made to suffer the onus of a criminal conviction except upon sufficient proof— defined as evidence necessary to convince a trier of fact beyond a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. SteinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. People v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. De JesusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API