Shapiro v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Parker,.
In this action of trespass the jury was discharged after the foreman announced . that they were, unani: mously agreed that the defendant had been negligent but were unable to come to any agreement as to the contributory negligence of plaintiff’s decedent. Defendant, having previously asked for binding instruc: tions, moved for judgment in its favor on the whole record pursuant to the provisions of the Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70, § 1 (12 PS § 684). After argument the court in banc dismissed the defendant’s motion and defendant has appealed. :
In view of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Guilinger v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Elliott v. Allegheny County Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Mullen v. Wilkes-Barre Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Ridgeway v. Sayre Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thomas v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Brillhart v. Edison Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Harris v. DeFeliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Borsa v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Reed v. Duquesne Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.