Legal Opinion
Martin v. Holzer Sheet Metal Works, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 23, 1978No. 9946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GULOTTA, Judge.
Plaintiff moves to dismiss defendants’ appeal in this Workmen’s Compensation suit on the grounds that defendants acquiesced in a judgment rendered against them. See C.C.P. 2085. We deny the motion.
Defendants, in answer to the motion, deny that they agreed on or acquiesced in a judgment providing for a lump sum settlement. The record, in pertinent part, reflects:
“THE COURT:
Judgment is hereby entered into declaring the Petitioner, Albert Martin, Sr., to be totally and permanently disabled under the Workmen’s Compensation Law which was applicable at the time of this injury. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emmons v. Agricultural Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Parkerson v. R-5, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Police Jury of Parish of St. James v. BorneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Succession of TullierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Mares v. Louisiana Wild Life & Fisheries CommissionLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by4 opinions
- Martin v. Holzer Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Martin v. Holzer Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Martin v. Holzer Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Martin v. Holzer Sheet Metal Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979