Legal Opinion

In Re Francisco

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico

Decided January 25, 2008No. 19-10433PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO OBTAIN BUDGET AND CREDIT COUNSELING PRIOR TO DATE OF FILING OF PETITION

JAMES S. STARZYNSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Nothing is simple.

That proposition is not surprising when applied to, say, quantum electrodynamics 1 ; it is more so when applied to § 109(h)(1) 2 . Nevertheless, a growing body of conflicting case law discloses clearcut disagreements about the interpretation of § 109(h)(1) and what to do about perceived violations.

Section 109(h)(1) 3 provides in relevant part as follows:

[A]n individual may not be a debtor under this…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re FranciscoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. In Re DufvaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
  3. In Re FranciscoBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API