Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kent v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 18, 1971Published

1Dissent

Moule, J. (dissenting).

Plaintiff and three others, who had been arrested and charged with robbery, were photographed in a police station by defendant’s photographer, but their names were not obtained. Plaintiff was later released and another suspect arrested. Defendant, not knowing that plaintiff had been released, obtained the names of the persons then under arrest and used them in connection with a newsfilm that same evening and the following day at noon.

Defendant’s photographer recalled going to the police station and taking the picture. He did not remember whether he asked questions…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Frechette v. Special Magazines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Taddeo v. TiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API