Legal Opinion
United States v. Plunk
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 21, 2007No. 06-35269PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plunk appeals from the district court’s Amended Final Decree of Forfeiture. The court awarded Plunk compensation in lieu of property to be returned under 28 U.S.C. § 2465 and calculated the amount due to Plunk based on the sale proceeds of the property. The court denied Plunk any additional compensation for consequential damages related to the seizure and forfeiture of the property, and disagreed with his argument that the value of the property should have been calculated at the date of its return. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I
Plunk…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Republic National Bank of Miami v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. $277,000 U.S. Currency, and One 1986 Dodge Ram Charger, Jalisco, Mexico, Lic. Hwy 773, and Ramon S. Montes, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. PlunkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Pierre Clifton MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008