Legal Opinion

Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family v. Matthew M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 2010No. B221851PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTHSCHILD, Acting P. J.

Matthew M. (father), the biological father of X.S., appeals from the judgment entered after the juvenile court declared his son a dependent child of the court based in part on a finding against father under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b),1 and ordered the child placed with his maternal grandmother. Because no substantial evidence supports the section 300, subdivision (b), finding against father, we reverse the judgment as to him and remand the matter for the juvenile court to reconsider its disposition orders.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re Marilyn HCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Alameda County Social Services Agency v. J.W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Jonathan G.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. V.M.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In re A.O. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. In re D.G. CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API