Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In Re the Estate of Campbell

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1963No. 4159Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

MIZUHA, J.,

WITH WHOM HAWKINS, CIRCUIT JUDGE CONCURS, WHILE JOINING THE OPINION OF THE COURT, DISSENTS FROM THE HOLDING THAT THE SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES HAVE A RIGHT TO APPEAL.

Although the trial judge found that “no evidence has been adduced that the present successor trustees (A. S. Davis, M. L. Randolph and George M. Collins, Findings of Fact No. 2) permitted any breach of trust by their predecessors to continue, neglected to compel their predecessors to turn over trust property, or neglected to take proper steps to redress any breach of trust,” there is no specification of error on the part of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goldtree v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. In re the Trust Estate of HoltHawaii Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Castle v. IrwinHawaii Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Castle v. IrwinHawaii Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Hawaiian Trust Co. v. KahalaoakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API