Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Hinton
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 19, 1961No. 2742Published
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Acting Judge.
The holder of a promissory note secured by a deed of trust sued one of the makers and the executor of the estate of another maker; also a trustee whom he charged with having wrongfully released the trust. On motion of one of the defend*925ants the court added as defendants the administrator of a person described as the last holder of the note, and also another person who had received money in payment of the release. All defendants filed answers in general denial.
When the case came on for trial plaintiff proved the execution of the note and testified that it had not been paid.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rogers v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- Merriam v. SugrueDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Brooks v. JensenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Fred Drew Const. Co. v. MireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Snyder v. ThornileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948