People v. Iniguez
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the Court
*Supp. 4Opinion
RICCIARDULLI, Acting P. J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant Noe Iniguez appeals the judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Defendant was convicted of two counts of violating a restraining order (Pen. Code, § 273.6, subd. (a)),1 and one count of distributing a private image (§ 647, subd. (j)(4)). Defendant contends on appeal that section 647, subdivision (j)(4), is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, the court misin-structed the jury, there was insufficient evidence to support the convictions, and the prosecutor committed misconduct during closing argument. As discussed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Elonis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- People v. HardyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Aguilar v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. ManibusanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. AustinIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. CulverCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018
- State v. Rebekah S. VanBurenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2019
- People v. AustinIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
- El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Norberto Rivera SáezTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2026