Legal Opinion

Aames Capital Corp. v. Ford

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 2002PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered April 9, 2001, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale and dismiss the action as against them for lack of jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Appellants’ conclusory claims of improper service are insufficient to rebut the prima facie showing of service made out by the process server’s affidavits (see, Fairmount Funding v Stefansky, 235 AD2d 213, 214; Matter of Nazarian v Monaco Imports, 255 AD2d 265). The claim made in their attorney’s affirmation that they were never…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Nazarian v. Monaco Imports, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Fairmount Funding Ltd. v. StefanskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. HossainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. SalmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PatrickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Pennymac, Corp. v. DiPrimaNew York Supreme Court · 2016
  5. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. PokuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API