Legal Opinion

Wall v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 22, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The plaintiff has recovered the amount of premiums paid by her on policies of life insurance with a “ facility of payment ” clause therein. The policies were taken out by a Mrs. Carri and allowed to lapse by non-payment of premiums. Plaintiff, as a friend of the insured, was then solicited by an agent to reinstate them by paying back premiums. After paying the premiums for about ten years she failed to pay further, and the policies again lapsed. She alleges that she was induced to pay the premiums by fraudulent representations of the agent.

The only claim of fraud is, in substance, that in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shea v. United States Industrial InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Foryciarz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  3. O'Connor Transportation Co. v. Glens Falls InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. In re the Estate of ArnottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  2. Holmes v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. St. Paul's Roman Catholic Church v. Westchester Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API