Huckert v. State

ON APPELLANT’S motion for rehearing.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant directs our attention to the fact that in her Bill of Exception No. 1 she complains of the remarks of the judge and not of the argument of counsel. She insists that we should *372hold that reversible error is shown and relies upon the case of Ward v. State, 156 Tex. Cr. Rep. 472, 243 S.W. 2d 695, as directly in point.

As stated in our original opinion, the county attorney was discussing the amount of alcohol required to effect intoxication. The argument was to the effect that maybe one person could drink a quart and be very sober, and do…