State v. Bowen
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Judge.
Defendant appeals from his conviction in the Court of Common Pleas on the charge of driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating beverage.
I
The first issue is whether statements made by defendant to the police officers should have been excluded because defendant had not been given the Miranda warnings. In State v. Bliss, Del.Supr., 238 A.2d 848 (1968), the Delaware Supreme Court held that “until the Supreme Court furnishes further guidelines, we will not apply [the Miranda rule] to motor violations.” The holding in Bliss is a direct recognition that in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- State v. BlissSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Weekley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bowen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975