Legal Opinion

Fort v. Fort

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 17 opinions

FROM ROBERTSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Eobertson County. — J. W. Stout, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

R. H. Sansom, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is before us on appeal from the decree of the chancery court of Eobertson county. The hill was filed for the purpose of enforcing the specific performance of an alleged contract of sale of real estate, and thereafter an amended bill was filed. To the original and amended bills a demurrer was interposed, which was by the chancellor sustained, and both bills dismissed, and from this decree sustaining the demurrer and dismissing complainant’s bills, they have appealed to this court.

The record was filed in this court on the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bacon v. LawrenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Latham's and Deming's AppealsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Pond v. TriggTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shepard v. LanierTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Chilen v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Elizabeth Harris v. James B. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  4. Federal Firefighters of Oak Ridge v. Roane-Anderson Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. McCormick v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API