Same v. Same
Nebraska Supreme Court
Rehearing of preceding case. cited: Curtis v. Cutler, 7 Neb., 315; Catron v. Shepherd, 8 Id., 308; Ball v. La Clair, 17 Id., 39; O’Donohue v. Hendrix, 13 Id., 255; Tingley v. Dolby, Id., 371, cited: Rathburn v. R. Co., 16 Neb., 441; Bell v. Sherer, 12 Id., 409; Foster v. Dohle, 17 Id., 631; Phillips, Mechanics’ Liens, p. 23, sec. 13; Griggs v. Le Poidevin, 11 Neb., 385; Schulcraft v. Ruck, 6 Daly [N. Y.], 1; Freeman v. Carson, 27 Minn., 516; Steigleman v. McBride, 17 111.,…
Read the full summary
Rehearing of preceding case. cited: Curtis v. Cutler, 7 Neb., 315; Catron v. Shepherd, 8 Id., 308; Ball v. La Clair, 17 Id., 39; O’Donohue v. Hendrix, 13 Id., 255; Tingley v. Dolby, Id., 371, cited: Rathburn v. R. Co., 16 Neb., 441; Bell v. Sherer, 12 Id., 409; Foster v. Dohle, 17 Id., 631; Phillips, Mechanics’ Liens, p. 23, sec. 13; Griggs v. Le Poidevin, 11 Neb., 385; Schulcraft v. Ruck, 6 Daly [N. Y.], 1; Freeman v. Carson, 27 Minn., 516; Steigleman v. McBride, 17 111., 300; McLaughlin v. Green, 48 Miss., 175;- Gaty v. Casey, 15 111., 189; Chapin v. Persse, 30 Conn., 461.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
An opinion was filed in this case January 28, 1890, affirming the judgment of the court below. Afterwards *244a motion for a rehearing was filed, and the court, fearing that a mistake had been made, granted a rehearing. A copy of the petition is set forth in the former opinion, and need not be repeated here.
The case has been carefully re-examined, and we are convinced that the former opinion is right.
Section 2, chapter 54, Comp. Stats., provides, “Any person or subcontractor who shall perform any labor for, or furnish any material or machinery or fixtures for, any of the purposes mentioned in the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Ashford v. Iowa & Minnesota Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- Zarrs v. KeckNebraska Supreme Court · 1894