Legal Opinion

Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Hobbs

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided August 15, 2002No. Civ.A. 02-A-400-NPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALBRITTON, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This cause is before the court on a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4) filed by the Defendant, Norman Hobbs.

The Plaintiff, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, filed a Complaint in this case bringing claims for a declaratory judgment that the Alabama Physician Assistant Statute is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”); for a declaratory judgment that the Alabama Physician Assistant Statute is invalid under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Contract Clause,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Theresa Plant v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc. Of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. John J. Cleckner and Ruth Cleckner, His Wife v. Republic Van and Storage Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferrari v. E-RATE CONSULTING SERVICESDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API