Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. Hobbs
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ALBRITTON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This cause is before the court on a Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4) filed by the Defendant, Norman Hobbs.
The Plaintiff, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, filed a Complaint in this case bringing claims for a declaratory judgment that the Alabama Physician Assistant Statute is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”); for a declaratory judgment that the Alabama Physician Assistant Statute is invalid under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, the Contract Clause,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Theresa Plant v. Blazer Financial Services, Inc. Of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- John J. Cleckner and Ruth Cleckner, His Wife v. Republic Van and Storage Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ferrari v. E-RATE CONSULTING SERVICESDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009