Gerard v. City of Boston
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The basement occupied by the plaintiffs on Pearl Street in Boston, a few feet from the corner of High Street, was flooded on December 11, 1933, and their stock of goods was damaged, because of the bursting of the water main of the defendant at the intersection of those streets. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence, the judge *489directed a verdict for the defendant, subject to the plaintiffs’ exception. The only question is, whether there was evidence of negligence of the defendant. There was evidence tending to show the following facts.
The water main was a twelve-inch “high service” pipe,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goldman v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Buono v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- A. DaPrato Co. v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Harvard Furniture Co. v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Brian v. B. Sopkin & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Musolino LoConte Co. v. Boston Consolidated Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Stein v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.