Tremblay v. J. Rudnick & Sons, Inc.

The defendant does not venture to deny that it was findably at fault, nor could such a suggestion be seriously entertained in view of the rules that, (1) “The master is bound ... to provide such reasonable rules and regulations as will enable the servants to do the work in safety,” and (2) “If ordinary care requires that a warning of dangers arising from the work should from time to time be given to his servants as the work progresses, it is the master’s duty to provide for such a warning.” McLaine v. Company, 71 N. H. 294, 297; Sirois v. Henry, 73 N. H. 148, 151. In this situation, the…