Legal Opinion
Southern New England Telephone Co. v. MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 16, 2005No. Civil Action 3:02cv274 (SRU)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT
UNDERHILL, District Judge.
The Southern New England Telephone Company, now doing business as SBC Connecticut, (“SBC”) has moved to amend or alter the judgment entered in this case on February 4, 2005. SBC believes the decision that led to that judgment, SNET v. MCI WorldCom, 353 F.Supp.2d 287 (D.Conn.2005) (“the Decision”), erroneously held: (1) that the FCC’s ISP Remand Order, 1 2001 WL 455869, 16 F.C.C.R. 9151 (Apr. 27, 2001), applies to all ISP-bound traffic, and (2) that Foreign Exchange (“FX”) traffic is subject to reciprocal compensation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Worldcom, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Sprint Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- Global Naps, Inc. v. Verizon New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006