Legal Opinion

Edmiston v. Tulane Investment Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1928No. 10,359PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

This is a suit to annul a tax sale.

The plaintiff alleged that he was the owner of the following described property:

“A lot of ground in the Third District of this city in the square No. 1100 bounded by Andry, Egania, Galvez and Miro Streets designated by the No. 23 and measuring 31 feet front on Andry Street by 12'2 feet deep.”

Being the same property purchased by plaintiff at a sale for a tax due the State for the year 1920, assessed in the name of F. P. Norris, by an act before John P. Sullivan, notary, dated April 20, 1922, Reg. C. O. Bk. 353, p. 13, on April 24, 1922.

That the said Rev. T.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kivlen v. HorvathSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. West v. NegrottoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  3. Barrow v. WilsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  4. Delouche v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  5. Hickman v. DawsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. TauzinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API