Ryder v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kourlis
In this case, we must determine whether a child therapist owes a duty of care to her patients' mother in a cireumstance in which she allegedly misdiagnosed symptoms of parental alienation and reported her findings to the father and to the children's new therapist. The court of appeals found that such a duty exists. Mitchell v. Ryder, 20 P.3d 1229, 1233 (Colo.App.2000). We disagree and now conclude that the duty the therapist owes the children themselves is primary and may, under certain cireumstances, require disclosure to the parents or other involved parties. Creating a duty to the parents…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- University of Denver v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Perreira v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Greenberg v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- Premier Farm Credit, PCA v. W-CATTLE, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Raleigh v. Performance Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Keller v. Koca ex rel. AlparSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.