American Employers' Insurance v. City of Medford
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
On the grounds that a city employee’s statutory right to be indemnified was personal and not assignable, the city of Medford refused to reimburse American Employers’ Insurance Company (“Employers”), the insurer of an indus*19trial arts teacher, William Mahoney, for the $153,000 it had paid in satisfaction of a judgment against Mahoney arising out of a classroom accident. Employers brought an action claiming indemnity, and a judge of the Superior Court, acting on cross motions for summary judgment, determined that Employers was entitled to indemnity under G. L. c. 41, § 100C, and entered judgment…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Berube v. Selectmen of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Sun Indemnity Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- St. Paul Insurance Companies v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Bridewell v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beaconsfield Townhouse Condominium Trust v. ZussmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Rubenstein v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Proteon, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999
- Bina v. MarksMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.