Legal Opinion

American Employers' Insurance v. City of Medford

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided January 5, 1995No. 93-P-203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

On the grounds that a city employee’s statutory right to be indemnified was personal and not assignable, the city of Medford refused to reimburse American Employers’ Insurance Company (“Employers”), the insurer of an indus*19trial arts teacher, William Mahoney, for the $153,000 it had paid in satisfaction of a judgment against Mahoney arising out of a classroom accident. Employers brought an action claiming indemnity, and a judge of the Superior Court, acting on cross motions for summary judgment, determined that Employers was entitled to indemnity under G. L. c. 41, § 100C, and entered judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Berube v. Selectmen of EdgartownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Sun Indemnity Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  4. St. Paul Insurance Companies v. Horace Mann Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Bridewell v. Board of EducationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beaconsfield Townhouse Condominium Trust v. ZussmanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  2. Rubenstein v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  3. Proteon, Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  4. Bina v. MarksMassachusetts Superior Court · 2006
  5. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API