Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. Board of Education of Holt Public Schools

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided March 12, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

McKEAGUE, District Judge.

I. OVERVIEW

This action grows out of plaintiffs Carl and Mary Sue McLaughlin’s dissatisfaction with the April 1999, individualized education program (“IEP”) formulated by defendant Board of Education of Holt Public Schools (“Holt”) for their daughter, Emma McLaughlin. Emma is presently eight years old. She has Down’s Syndrome. Pursuant to the IEP, Emma was to attend school approximately seven miles from her home, in a half-day regular kindergarten classroom, and receive special education services in a categorical classroom in the afternoon. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Doe v. Board Education Tullahoma City SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Brimmer v. Traverse City Area Public SchoolsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
  3. Emily Hudson, by and Through Her Parent, Sharon Hudson v. Bloomfield Hills Public Schools, Michigan Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Hudson Ex Rel. Hudson v. Bloomfield Hills Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API