Legal Opinion

In re the Personal Restraint of Mahrle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 1997No. 16519-1-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurtz, J.

— Craig Edward Mahrle seeks relief from personal restraint imposed following his conviction of solicitation to commit second degree murder. He contends the Department of Corrections (DOC) has incorrectly applied RCW 9.94A.150(1) to his sentence. That statute provides that for certain offenses, an inmate may earn early release time equal to only 15 percent of his total sentence. Mr. Mahrle believes his crime falls under the general "other case” provision of the same statute that permits earned early release time for up to one-third of the sentence.

RCW 9.94A.150(1) reads:

[T]he term of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. All Seasons Living Centers, Inc. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Sehome Park Care Center, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. In re the Welfare of A.T.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API