Carroll v. Blinken
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:
Thomas Jefferson recognized that “to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves, is sinful and tyrannical.” 1 At the same time, our nation’s universities preserve a longstanding tradition of tolerating and even encouraging the propagation of all sorts of disbelieved opinions. We are asked today, in a case that involves competing concerns of the First Amendment, to resolve the conflict that occurs when Jefferson’s “tyrannical” compulsion occurs in a collegiate setting. On the one hand, university students…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Washington Legal Foundation v. Massachusetts Bar FoundationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Hays County Guardian v. Jerome K. SuppleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Levin v. HarlestonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Scott H. Southworth, Amy Schoepke, Keith Bannach v. Michael W. Grebe, Sheldon B. Lubar, Jonathan B. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Carroll v. BlinkenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.