Legal Opinion · Dissent

Metropolitan Toyota, Inc. v. State ex rel. Galanos

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 3, 1986No. 84-1104Published

1DissentMaddox, Justice

I am of the opinion that the judgment of condemnation of the automobile should be affirmed, and I base my opinion on what I consider to be the applicable law as applied to a factual situation such as this case presents. I recognize that the rule which allows the State to condemn another’s *28property seems to place a heavy burden on automobile dealers like Metropolitan Toyota; nevertheless, it is my opinion that this Court, in prior cases, has sustained judgments of condemnation under similar facts and circumstances. Consequently, I believe that the Court in this case has failed to follow the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cougar Min. Co. v. MINERAL LAND & MIN. CONSULT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Reeder v. State Ex Rel. MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Eleven Automobiles v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1980
  4. Flint Motor Car Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. Equitable Credit Co. v. State Ex Rel. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API