McGarrah v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.
Appellant, Edgar McGar-rali, was tried on an information charging him with the murder of Franklin Holloway. The nncontradicted facts established that appellant was playing a game of pool with Billy Bridges; that Holloway, Lem McGarrah (appellant’s brother) and others were seated nearby and watching- the game; that conversation was passing between the participants and the onlookers; that just after appellant had made a good shot and won the game, Hoi-loway arose and took a step; and that appellant struck Holloway on the head with the pool cue, inflicting a skull…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ringer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Gilchrist v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966