Legal Opinion
Opinion No. (1998)
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided January 26, 1998Published
1Opinion of the Court
Dear Senator Capps,
¶ 0 This office has received your request for an Attorney General Opinion in which you asked, in effect, the following questions:
1. Is a mediator who works for a dispute resolution programestablished by a county government under the provisions of 12O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1997, §§ 1801-1813, an employee of thatcounty? 2. Is such a mediator subject to the salary schedules andsalary limitations set forth in 19 O.S. Supp. 1997, §§180.62-180.68? 3. Is such a mediator authorized to be covered by the county'sretirement system? 4. Is the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 O.S. 1991…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tulsa Exposition & Fair Corp. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Oklahoma City News Broadcasters Ass'n v. NighSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Bynum v. Western Surety Co. of Sioux Falls, S.D.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958