Legal Opinion

Sklar v. Maxwell B. & L. Assn.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 1932No. Appeal 97PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant building and loan association, of which he is a member, the matured value of certain shares of installment stock. The action is in assumpsit in the form of a case stated.

We will recite such of the agreed facts as are material and essential to a determination of the controversy. The plaintiff, Morris Sklar, subscribed for five shares of installment stock in the Maxwell Building & Loan Association and made the regular monthly payments until February, 1929, when there had been paid in the stun of $830. At a meeting of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sperling v. Euclid B. & L. Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Quin v. CallahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  3. Appeal of CriswellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rosenblatt v. Potential Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Comet Building & Loan Assn's Petition, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1935
  3. In re Great Oak Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API