Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Gillespie

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 25, 1928No. 218PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

During the progress of the trial, the following questions of law were passed on by the court:

Mr. Morford, counsel for the plaintiff, offered in evidence the testimony of a witness given at a former trial of this case in which the jury had disagreed. It appeared that a subpoena had been issued for the witness in question, but had been returned non est.

In support of the offer, counsel cited Jones on Evidence (Civil Cases) 507, § 341.

Mr. Finger, counsel for the defendant, objected, saying:

“I never heard of testimony at a former trial being introduced into evidence. I have known it to be done by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miles v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Smith v. . HartsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Gilman, Son & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Potter v. Ajax Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Rogers v. RogersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Parson v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1972
  2. Claridge Assocs., LLC v. Schepis (In re Pursuit Capital Mgmt., LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  3. Hall v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1994
  4. Hannigan v. Italo Petroleum Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935
  5. Hannigan v. Italo Petroleum Corp. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API