State v. Rogan
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. L. H. Prather, Judge. The information upon which defendant was arraigned was as follows: “J. "W. Feighan, prosecuting attorney in and for the county of Spokane and state of Washington, comes here into court and, in the name and by the authority of the state of Washington, gives the court to understand and be informed that the said defendant, James Kogan, is hereby charged with the crime of seduction, committed as follows,…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County.—Hon. L. H. Prather, Judge. The information upon which defendant was arraigned was as follows: “J. "W. Feighan, prosecuting attorney in and for the county of Spokane and state of Washington, comes here into court and, in the name and by the authority of the state of Washington, gives the court to understand and be informed that the said defendant, James Kogan, is hereby charged with the crime of seduction, committed as follows, to-wit: That on the 30th day of April, A. D. 1895, at the county of Spokane and state of Washington, James Kogan, then and…
1Opinion of the Court
*45The opinion of the court was delivered by
Reavis, J.
Appellant appeals from a conviction of seduction. There is no statement of facts certified in the case. The motion of. respondent to strike the papers purporting to contain the statement of facts is sustained.
Appellant for the first time in the case here challenges the sufficiency of the information and contends that it does not state a crime. "We think the facts stated in the information are sufficient to constitute the crime of seduction. The other two grounds of objection made by appellant here, that the information does not substantially…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anderson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. MasonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- State v. ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 1953