Richard T. Cook, Jr. And Vernon C. Hill v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
On oral argument for the first time, appellants urged that it was error per se for the trial court to elicit information from the jury as to its numerical standing. In the district court the two appellants were tried and convicted of rape in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2031. The jury had retired at 12:10 P.M. on Wednesday, May 15, 1957. At 2:40 P.M. they returned to inquire whether they could bring in a verdict with a recommendation of mercy. At 5:10 P.M. they again returned to ask whether, if they made a recommendation, they could suggest a length of imprisonment. At 5:40 P.M. (still the same…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. James Hugh RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Rodney Leon Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- James Huffman and Evelyn Nelson Huffman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- J. W. Williamson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Huey Augustus Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.