Legal Opinion
In Re Sweitzer
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided October 13, 2005No. LA 04-18590 TAPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION RE DEBTOR’S MOTION TO AVOID LIEN
THEODOR C. ALBERT, Bankruptcy-Judge.
This case requires a determination of the meaning of “gross annual income” as used in California’s statute regarding homesteads for debtors over 55 years of age.
Debtor filed a motion under 11 U.S.C. 522(f)(1) to avoid the judicial lien of Liner, Yankelevitz, Sunshine & Regenstreif, LLP (“Liner”). Liner timely filed an opposition and request for a hearing on the motion. Debtor in his motion alleges that Liner’s lien impairs his homestead exemption, which Debtor claims is $150,000 pursuant to California Code…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Morgan v. Federal Deposit Insurance (In Re Morgan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Hahn v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
- Matter of FaberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Iowa · 1987
- Shelley v. Kendall (In Re Shelley)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Broadway Foreclosure Investments, LLC v. TarlessonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- In re DeGourUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2012
- In Re BushUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2006