Legal Opinion

Giddings v. Freedbey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 6, 1904No. 53PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Vermont. This cause comes here upon writ of error to review a judgment of the Circuit Court, district of Vermont, against the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants below. Theaction is for trespass, and thejudgment was entered upon verdict of a jury in favor of defendants in error for $996. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. ,

1Opinion of the Court

UACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs, citizens and residents of Pennsylvania, owned a marble mill operated by steam, and a quarry connected therewith, all in Dorset, Vt. On April 8] 1902, a writ of attachment in favor of one Gilman B. Wilson, of Dorset, against the senior plaintiff, William G. Freedley, was duly issued, in which the ad damnum was $12,000. This writ was seasonably placed in the hands of defendant Giddings, of Manchester, a constable having authority to serve the same. Under the laws of Vermont, such an attachment can be served upon real property only by delivering a true and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Folsom v. Town of UnderhillSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  2. Hill v. WentworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  3. Harris v. HaynesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
  4. Kendall v. HathawaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nevada Credit Rating Bureau, Inc. v. WilliamsNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Norman Lumber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
  3. Triumph Electric Co. v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API