Legal Opinion

Givaudan Fragrances Corp v. James Krivda

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 12, 2016No. 14-1590UnpublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

Introduction

Appellant Givaudan Fragrances Corporation creates and produces flavor and fragrance compounds for foods and beverages, household goods, personal care products and — most relevant to this appeal — fine fragrances and perfumes. Gi-vaudan sued a former employee, Appellee James Krivda, and his new employer, Ap-pellee Mane USA, Inc., claiming Krivda stole more than six hundred fragrance formulas before leaving its employ. Litigation has been ongoing since September of 2008. After granting summary judgment to the Appellees on the vast majority of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Abrams v. Lightolier Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of HomeLand SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Gibson v. Mayor And Council Of The City Of WilmingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. Imax Corporation v. Cinema Technologies, Inc. Neil JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. TLS Mgmt. and Mktg. Ser. LLC v. Rodriguez-ToledoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
  2. Applied Predictive Technologies, Inc. v. MarketDial, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2024
  3. CONTOUR DATA SOLUTIONS LLC v. GRIDFORCE ENERGY MANAGEMENT LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. ELMAGIN CAPITAL, LLC v. CHENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. ELMAGIN CAPITAL, LLC v. CHENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API