Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schmidt v. Schwear

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 27, 1981No. 79-525Published

1DissentJustice Harrison

I respectfully dissent.

The majority holds that plaintiff’s instructions 16 and 17 which were given by the trial court over defendant’s objection, were erroneous. For the following reasons, I am compelled to dissent from the majority holding that these errors were “harmless.” “The importance of correct instructions was commented on in the case of Sharp v. Brown, 349 Ill. App. 269, the court there saying: ‘It has long been the law that a jury must be especially accurately instructed if the case be one where the facts are close and where a verdict could easily favor either party in the suit.’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Belfield v. CoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Swenson v. WintercornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Kolze v. FordtranIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Knudson v. KnudsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Redmond v. SteeleIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API