Legal Opinion

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1921No. 9934Published

Error from District Court, Kay County; W. M. 'Bowles, Judge. Action by Fairbanks, Morse & Company, a corporation, against Joseph C. Miller and others on promissory note. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

KENNAMER, J.

This cause is before the court upon a petition for rehearing filed by Fairbanks, Morse & Company, plaintiff in error, and counsel in support of the petition for rehearing have, -with much ability and earnestness, presented numerous reasons why the motion for rehearing should be sustained. This action was originally commenced in the district court of Kay county by the plaintiff in error against Joseph O. Miller et al. to recover upon a promissory note given in payment of the purchase price of a tractor engine sold the defendants in error in June, 1914, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hawkins v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Davis Calyx Drill Co. v. MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Jones v. Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Blackmore v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API