Legal Opinion
Razkane v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 21, 2009No. 08-9519PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Tarik Razkane remained in the United States beyond the period authorized by his non-immigrant visa. After receiving a notice to appear from the Department of Homeland Security charging him as removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(B), Razkane applied for, inter alia, restriction on removal pursuant to the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). The Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denied Razkane’s request for restriction on removal. The IJ determined Razkane had not made the necessary showing that it was more likely than not he…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Geovanni Hernandez-Montiel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Ali v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Uanreroro v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Sidabutar v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dallakoti v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Jimenez-Guzman v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Todorovic v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Lujan-Jimenez v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Gutierrez-Orozco v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.