Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Rechek

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 8, 1985No. 84-903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

The automobile policy in this case included, among those insured, relatives of the household provided that the relatives did not own a “private passenger automobile.” To be decided on this appeal is whether this state will recognize the majority rule adopted in other jurisdictions that a vehicle can reach such a condition of disrepair that it can no longer be considered an automobile for insurance policy purposes. We adopt the majority rule for Wisconsin, as did the trial court, and we affirm.

Curtis Rechek was involved in an accident on December 24, 1975. He was living at home with his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wisconsin Builders, Inc. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bertler v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Glens Falls Insurance Company v. A. R. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. Quick v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Insurance v. NemetzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  2. Santana v. Auto Owners InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Hulsey v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. Peabody v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API