Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Bond

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1929No. 19451Published

1Opinion

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING.

Broyles, C. J.

It is true (as pointed out in the motion for a rehearing) that in Town of Decatur v. Jaudon, 136 Ga. 854 (supra), there was no alteration of the plans and specifications submitted by Jaúdon and accepted by the Town of Decatur, and that in the instant case the original plans and specifications submitted by Bond, the contractor, and accepted by Cobb, the owner of the stores to be built by Bond, were so changed as to increase the cost of the buildings. In our opinion, however, that distinction between the facts of the two cases is immaterial for the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Decatur v. JaudonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API